ET.
All writing

AI prototyping · Draft for review

How to Turn an AI Opportunity into a Testable Prototype

A practical sequence for narrowing an AI opportunity into a working experience that can produce useful evidence.

July 31, 20264 min readElisha Terada

An AI opportunity usually arrives larger than a product.

“Help employees use our knowledge.” “Automate the intake process.” “Give customers a smarter assistant.”

These directions may be valuable, but they contain too many users, behaviors, systems, and assumptions to test at once.

The first job is not to turn the entire opportunity into software. It is to find the smallest working experience that can change an important decision.

Choose one consequential moment

Begin inside the workflow, not at the beginning of a feature list.

Find a moment where better information or assistance could change what a person does. It should be narrow enough to observe and important enough to matter.

For a service team, that moment might be preparing for an unusual customer case. For a field technician, it might be deciding which repair procedure applies. For a sales team, it might be identifying evidence that changes the next conversation.

The narrower moment gives the prototype a user, a trigger, and a consequence.

Write the behavior before the interface

Teams often jump from opportunity to screens. With AI, the behavior underneath the screen is the less familiar—and often riskier—part.

Describe what the product should do in plain language:

  • What information does it receive?
  • What does it produce or recommend?
  • What sources or rules should shape the result?
  • When should it ask a question?
  • What can it do automatically?
  • How can a person review, correct, or stop it?

This description is an interaction model. It does not need technical notation. It gives designers, engineers, subject experts, and sponsors one system to discuss.

Find the assumption that could break the idea

Every AI opportunity depends on beliefs.

The necessary data exists. The output will be accurate enough. People will trust the recommendation. Review will not erase the time saved. The organization can support the new workflow.

Do not prototype all of them equally. Identify the assumption that would make the opportunity unattractive if it proved false.

If the idea depends on organizational knowledge, test representative documents and permissions. If value depends on speed, include correction and review time. If adoption depends on trust, prototype sources, uncertainty, and recovery—not only the answer.

That assumption should determine what becomes real first.

Build a thin path through the system

A testable prototype needs enough fidelity for people to behave realistically, but not production completeness.

Build one end-to-end path:

  1. A representative user begins with a real task.
  2. The system receives realistic information.
  3. The AI performs the important behavior.
  4. The user reviews or changes the result.
  5. The result enters the next step of the workflow.

Some parts can be simulated. A person can provide data behind the scenes. Integrations can be represented rather than completed. Outputs can be constrained to a narrow set of cases.

What matters is preserving the behavior the team needs to learn about.

Prototype the uncertainty, not the architecture.

Put realistic friction back in

A prototype shown only by its creators tends to work too well.

Use inputs the team did not write specifically for the demo. Include incomplete cases. Let intended users operate the experience without coaching. Observe where they hesitate, override the system, or ask for information the product does not provide.

The goal is not to make the model fail. It is to learn where the proposed product depends on conditions that real work will not reliably provide.

Capture evidence for the next decision

Before the test, agree on what you will observe.

Did the user complete the task? Was the output useful after review? Which corrections recurred? Did the new workflow remove effort or move it elsewhere? What new risk appeared? What would the organization need to operate this responsibly?

At the end, the team should be able to make one of four decisions:

  • Proceed with the direction.
  • Narrow or change the behavior.
  • Resolve a data, trust, or operating constraint first.
  • Stop investing in this opportunity.

A prototype is not a small production release. It is a temporary product built to make uncertainty visible.

When it does that well, the next build decision becomes smaller, clearer, and easier to defend.